THEODICY:
WHY IS THERE EVIL IF GOD IS GOOD?
How can evil exist in the world if God is good? Why is there good and evil in the creation? How could evil
exist if the world was created by a good and all-powerful God? Two classical arguments have been used to
answer this question.
Theodicy of Free Will
God created a world of unspoiled harmony, beauty, and order at the beginning of time. Evil is
introduced by the free acts
of the spiritual beings whom God created – and so evil is the disorder that consequently infects the entire
universe. The bad angels and the first human couple misused the gift of freedom bestowed upon them by
God.
The theodicy (or cosmology) of free will is usually traced back to the theology of Augustine of
Hippo. However, the evolutionary theory has impacted this understanding. Nevertheless, the belief that evil
has its source in man’s free deviation from God’s will (a deviation for which man alone is responsible) still
influences many theologians.
Augustine does not offer a good reason why some angels cleaved to the good and others did not if
all were initially created in the same state of perfection and happiness. Karl Rahner, a modern theologian
influenced by Augustine, was also forced to abandon the theodicy of free will as an adequate response of
Christian faith to the understanding of evil.
Theodicy of Development
God creates the world not all at once, but over a long period of time. His creative work will be
complete only when time ends and an eternal state of intimate communion between men and God is permanently
established. Evil is linked to the incomplete character of the created order as it evolves.
The way of justifying God’s goodness and power in the light of evil is to describe the positive
role it can play in leading to salvation and how its sting is diminished by the nature of that end. God
ordains evil as well as the good but never independently of the good – the evil serves the good. The logic
behind such a paradoxical position is developmental – man must grow into God-consciousness. In sum, sin and evil are
not only permitted but ordained by God – the consciousness of sin serves the development of the consciousness
of God.
Two theologians who exemplify this thinking are Friedrich Schleiermacher and Teilhard de
Chardin.
Criticism of the Two Classical
Theodicies
Both the theodicy of free will and theodicy of development have logical difficulties and ambiguities –
despite the profundity of their insights and their usefulness in understanding freedom, human initiative, and
cosmic development. They seem only to move the problem back one step further or to obscure deeper issues at
stake.
Source: Notes are based on Michael Galligan, God and Evil (New York: Paulist Press, 1976), 17-37.
Photo
credit: Intellimon Ltd.
|